2003 AC Cobra vs. 1982 Volvo 260

To start off, 2003 AC Cobra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 308 kg more than 2003 AC Cobra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 260. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Cobra 1982 Volvo 260
Make AC Volvo
Model Cobra 260
Year Released 2003 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 2849 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 350 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 91 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 73 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1062 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2660 mm