2003 AC Cobra vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Cobra would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 358 kg more than 2003 AC Cobra.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

2003 AC Cobra 2009 Mazda RX-8
Make AC Mazda
Model Cobra RX-8
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Roadster Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 1308 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 350 HP 189 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 78.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 83.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1062 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2710 mm