2003 AC Cobra vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 AC Cobra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 AC Cobra (350 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 AC Cobra (400 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 2003 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado. 2011 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2003 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 2003 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 AC Cobra | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Cobra | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
