2003 Acura CL vs. 1960 Austin 7
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 970 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura CL (294 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2003 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura CL | 1960 Austin 7 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | CL | 7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 60 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 62.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 68.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 26 L |