2003 Acura CL vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Acura CL. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura CL | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | CL | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3030 mm |
