2003 Acura CL vs. 1970 Chevrolet C-10
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Chevrolet C-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Chevrolet C-10 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 (250 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Acura CL. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Chevrolet C-10 should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura CL.
Because 1970 Chevrolet C-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Chevrolet C-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura CL | 1970 Chevrolet C-10 | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | CL | C-10 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 250 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |