2003 Acura CL vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 398 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura CL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura CL | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | CL | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2640 mm |