2003 Acura CL vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura CL | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Acura | Buick |
Model | CL | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |