2003 Acura CL vs. 1992 Holden Apollo

To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 375 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura CL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2003 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura CL 1992 Holden Apollo
Make Acura Holden
Model CL Apollo
Year Released 2003 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 294 Nm 172 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1205 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2610 mm