2003 Acura CL vs. 2012 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Acura CL. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura CL.

Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura CL. (294 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura CL.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura CL 2012 Jaguar XF
Make Acura Jaguar
Model CL XF
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 237 HP
Torque 294 Nm 500 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 70 L