2003 Acura EL vs. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2003 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1120 kg more than 2003 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | EL | Biarritz |
Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3300 mm |