2003 Acura EL vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP) has 73 more horse power than 2003 Acura EL. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 962 kg more than 2003 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura EL | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | EL | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2050 mm |
