2003 Acura EL vs. 1966 Alpine A
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 555 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura EL | 1966 Alpine A | |
| Make | Acura | Alpine |
| Model | EL | A |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2110 mm |
