2003 Acura EL vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2003 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 935 kg more than 2003 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | EL | Sixty |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3390 mm |