2003 Acura EL vs. 1967 BMW 2000
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 BMW 2000.
Because 1967 BMW 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 BMW 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1967 BMW 2000 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | EL | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2560 mm |