2003 Acura EL vs. 1976 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Simca 2 Litres is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 55 kg more than 1976 Simca 2 Litres.
Because 1976 Simca 2 Litres is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Simca 2 Litres. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1976 Simca 2 Litres | |
Make | Acura | Simca |
Model | EL | 2 Litres |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1981 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |