2003 Acura EL vs. 1978 Renault Alpine
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Renault Alpine (148 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Acura EL. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura EL.
Because 1978 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Renault Alpine (204 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura EL. (155 Nm). This means 1978 Renault Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura EL | 1978 Renault Alpine | |
| Make | Acura | Renault |
| Model | EL | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
