2003 Acura EL vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 80 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura EL. (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | EL | 360 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |