2003 Acura EL vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Acura EL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 410 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura EL (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura EL | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Acura | Zastava |
Model | EL | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2160 mm |