2003 Acura EL vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura EL weights approximately 160 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura EL (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura EL 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Acura Mitsubishi
Model EL Colt
Year Released 2003 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1668 cc 1499 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 155 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1020 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 3880 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2630 mm