2003 Acura NSX vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Acura NSX is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Acura NSX. (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura NSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2003 Acura NSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura NSX | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | NSX | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 5423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3290 mm |