2003 Acura NSX vs. 1982 Volvo 260

To start off, 2003 Acura NSX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura NSX (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura NSX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1982 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura NSX (285 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 260. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 260.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura NSX 1982 Volvo 260
Make Acura Volvo
Model NSX 260
Year Released 2003 1982
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 2977 cc 2849 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 249 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 5300 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2660 mm