2003 Acura NSX vs. 1993 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2003 Acura NSX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura NSX | 1993 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Acura | Mazda |
| Model | NSX | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1993 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 249 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2460 mm |
