2003 Acura NSX vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2003 Acura NSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Acura NSX. (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura NSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura NSX weights approximately 180 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura NSX (285 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2003 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura NSX | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | NSX | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 9000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5300 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1360 mm |