2003 Acura RSX vs. 1950 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,485 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1950 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1950 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 458 kg more than 2003 Acura RSX.
Because 1950 Jaguar MK V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar MK V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1950 Jaguar MK V | |
Make | Acura | Jaguar |
Model | RSX | MK V |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3485 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2900 mm |