2003 Acura RSX vs. 1959 Alpine A 106
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Alpine A 106. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Alpine A 106 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1959 Alpine A 106. (37 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1959 Alpine A 106.
Because 1959 Alpine A 106 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Alpine A 106. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1959 Alpine A 106 | |
Make | Acura | Alpine |
Model | RSX | A 106 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 904 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 28 L |