2003 Acura RSX vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (197 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 636 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RSX (192 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1959 DAF 600 | |
Make | Acura | DAF |
Model | RSX | 600 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 45 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 28 L |