2003 Acura RSX vs. 1968 Lotus 49
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2003 Acura RSX. (197 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2003 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 750 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Because 1968 Lotus 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura RSX | 1968 Lotus 49 | |
| Make | Acura | Lotus |
| Model | RSX | 49 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 516 kg |
