2003 Acura RSX vs. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 279 kg more than 2003 Acura RSX.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | RSX | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |