2003 Acura RSX vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 456 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura RSX | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
| Model | RSX | Colt |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2310 mm |
