2003 Acura RSX vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (197 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 86 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Acura RSX. (192 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | RSX | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |