2003 Acura RSX vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (197 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 396 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RSX (192 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2003 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | RSX | 100 1.4 D |
Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 89 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85.9 mm | 70.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 81.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |