2003 Acura RSX vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RSX (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Acura RSX | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | RSX | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |