2003 Acura RSX vs. 2010 Seat Exeo

To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (197 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2010 Seat Exeo. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2010 Seat Exeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Seat Exeo weights approximately 134 kg more than 2003 Acura RSX.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RSX (192 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Seat Exeo. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Seat Exeo.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura RSX 2010 Seat Exeo
Make Acura Seat
Model RSX Exeo
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 197 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 192 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 6000 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1266 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4661 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1772 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2642 mm