2003 Acura RSX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura RSX (191 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2003 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Acura RSX | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | RSX | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2525 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 46 L |
