2003 Acura TL vs. 1998 Daewoo Matiz

To start off, 2003 Acura TL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura TL (225 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura TL weights approximately 725 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2003 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Daewoo Matiz. 2003 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1998 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 1998 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Acura TL 1998 Daewoo Matiz
Make Acura Daewoo
Model TL Matiz
Year Released 2003 1998
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 225 HP 49 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 294 Nm 69 Nm
Torque RPM 4700 RPM 4600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 68.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1578 kg 853 kg
Vehicle Length 4900 mm 3500 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1500 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2350 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 35 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]