2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 3,178 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 (247 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 603 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 (300 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1962 DAF 750 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | DAF |
Model | 147 | 750 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3178 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |