2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | 60 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 5671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3230 mm |