2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1950 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,387 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (189 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 558 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1950 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Maserati |
Model | 156 | A6G |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 876 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2560 mm |