2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.

Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C
Make Alfa Romeo Alfa Romeo
Model 156 6C
Year Released 2003 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1746 cc 2443 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 100 mm
Top Speed 208 km/hour 165 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1265 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2710 mm