2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1954 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,910 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Crestline weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1954 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1954 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 156 | Crestline |
Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 3910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2940 mm |