2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1957 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (189 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1957 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | 62 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3290 mm |