2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1959 Jaguar MK VIII

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar MK VIII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar MK VIII would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar MK VIII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (118 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar MK VIII weights approximately 450 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Jaguar MK VIII is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Jaguar MK VIII. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jaguar MK VIII (292 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (146 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1959 Jaguar MK VIII will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 1959 Jaguar MK VIII
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model 156 MK VIII
Year Released 2003 1959
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 3442 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 292 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75.7 mm 106 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1315 kg 1765 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 77 L