2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1961 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 877 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1961 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1961 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 2142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |