2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1963 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 156 | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |
