2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 440 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Oldsmobile |
Model | 156 | Starfire |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 6965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3130 mm |