2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane

To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. (162 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 173 kg more than 2003 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 1967 Ford Fairlane
Make Alfa Romeo Ford
Model 156 Fairlane
Year Released 2003 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1968 cc 6392 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 162 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1285 kg 1458 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5110 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 125 L