2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,387 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1968 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin-Healey |
Model | 156 | Sprite |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 714 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 27 L |