2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,492 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin-Healey |
Model | 156 | Sprite |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1270 cc |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1350 mm |