2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (189 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 (218 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 156 | 66 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |